Re: [Patch] export sched_setscheduler() for kernel module use

[Ingo Molnar]

* Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >Using the linear priority has the
> >advantage of not having to pass any policy value - priorities between 0
> >and 99 implicitly mean SCHED_FIFO, priorities above that would mean
> >SCHED_NORMAL, a pretty natural and compact interface.
> 
> Just curious--why FIFO and not RR?

it shouldnt matter - if it matters, i.e. if any of these threads uses up
significant amount of CPU time then they should probably _not_ have a RT
priority to begin with.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/