Re: [discuss] Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 12:55 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:28:20AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Can you show some examples? We don't have this for any other
> > architecture.
> 
> Just grep for any use of X86 in Kconfig.

OK, I'll pick the first I find...

config ATP
        tristate "AT-LAN-TEC/RealTek pocket adapter support"
        depends on NET_POCKET && ISA && X86

Why is that OK on x86_64 but not Alpha? Why isn't the use of X86 a bug
in that case?

-- 
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/