Re: page fault scalability patch V11 [0/7]: overview

[Nick Piggin]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > Note that I have posted two other approaches of dealing with the rss problem:
>
>
> You could also make "rss" be a _signed_ integer per-thread.
>
> When unmapping a page, you decrement one of the threads that shares the mm 
> (doesn't matter which - which is why the per-thread rss may go negative), 
> and when mapping a page you increment it.
>
> Then, anybody who actually wants a global rss can just iterate over
> threads and add it all up. If you do it under the mmap_sem, it's stable,
> and if you do it outside the mmap_sem it's imprecise but stable in the
> long term (ie errors never _accumulate_, like the non-atomic case will 
> do).
>
> Does anybody care enough? Maybe, maybe not. It certainly sounds a hell of 
> a lot better than the periodic scan.

I think this sounds like it might be a good idea. I prefer it to having
the unbounded error of sloppy rss (as improbable as it may be in practice).

The per thread rss may wrap (maybe not 64-bit counters), but even so,
the summation over all threads should still end up being correct I
think.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/