Re: page fault scalability patch V11 [0/7]: overview

[Nick Piggin]

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>
> > > Unprivileged triggers for full-tasklist scans are NMI oops material.
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:25:37PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > What about pushing the per-thread rss delta back into the global atomic
> > rss counter in each schedule()?
> > Pros:
> > This would take the task exiting problem into its stride as a matter of
> > course.
> > Single atomic read to get rss.
> > Cons:
> > would just be moving the atomic op somewhere else if we don't get
> > many page faults per schedule.
> > Not really nice dependancies.
> > Assumes schedule (not context switch) must occur somewhat regularly.
> > At present this is not true for SCHED_FIFO tasks.
> > Too nasty?
>
>
> This doesn't sound too hot. There's enough accounting that can't be
> done anywhere but schedule(), and this can be done elsewhere. Plus,
> you're moving an already too-frequent operation to a more frequent
> callsite.

No, it won't somehow increase the number of atomic rss operations
just because schedule is called more often. The number of ops will
be at _most_ the number of page faults.

But I agree with your overall evaluation of its 'hotness'. Just
another idea. Give this monkey another thousand years at the keys
and he'll come up with the perfect solution :P
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/