Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST

[Alan Cox]

On Gwe, 2004-11-19 at 20:23, brking@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> +#define PCI_READ_CONFIG(size,type)	\
> +int pci_read_config_##size	\
> +	(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos, type *val)	\
> +{									\
> +	unsigned long flags;					\
> +	int ret = 0;						\
> +	if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;	\
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&access_lock, flags);		\
> +	if (!dev->block_cfg_access)				\
> +		ret = pci_bus_read_config_##size(dev->bus, dev->devfn, pos, val);	\
> +	else if (pos < sizeof(dev->saved_config_space))		\
> +		*val = (type)dev->saved_config_space[pos/sizeof(dev->saved_config_space[0])]; \
> +	else								\
> +		*val = -1;						\
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&access_lock, flags);	\
> +	return ret;							\
> +}

Several vendors (for good or for bad) require configuration space is
touched from interrupts on fast paths. This change will _really_ hurt
random PC class machines so please make it more sensible in its
condition handling.

To start with you can do something like

	if(unlikely(dev->designed_badly)) {
		slow_spinlock_path
	}
	/* Designed less badly 8) */
	existing code path

Even better, put that code in your private debug tree. Replace the
locked cases with BUG() and fix the driver to get its internal locking
right in this situation.

It seems wrong to put expensive checks in core code paths when you could
just as easily provide

	my_device_is_stupid_pci_read_config_byte()

and equivalent lock taking functions that wrap the existing ones and are
locked against the reset path without hurting sane computing devices
(and PC's).

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/