Re: 2.6 and route nat. Now I know. It's dead.

[Peter Volkov Alexandrovich]

On Friday 19 November 2004 19:31, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:20:13 +0300, Peter Volkov Alexandrovich wrote:
> > Short question: Must "route nat", mentioned in ip-cref documentation
> > coming with iproute2 package, work with 2.6.9 kernel?
>
> Support for CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_NAT was removed from the kernel - it has been
> broken by some networking changes, and nobody bothered to fix it.
>
> See this thread in linux-netdev:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=109582576330019&w=2
>
> You can use netfilter (iptables etc.) for NAT and more, but probably it
> will consume more resources than the old "route nat" code.

Thank you for your answer. It's really pity. It's very bad.

-- 

______________________________________

Volkov Peter, <pvolkov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Moscow State University, Phys. Dep.
______________________________________

NO ePATENTS, eSIGN now on:
http://petition.eurolinux.org
and maybe this helps...

Linux 2.4.26-gentoo-r9 i686
Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1.60GHz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/