Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.29-0,and 30-9

[Lee Revell]

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 16:22 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Just curious to why you scale the interrupts from 49 down to 25.  What
> would be wrong with keeping all of them at 49 (or whatever). Being a
> FIFO, no interrupt would preempt another. Why would you want the first
> IRQs to be registered have higher priority than (and thus will preempt)
> irqs registered later.

I raised this issue before.  I agree that all interrupts should get the
same RT prio by default.  Otherwise the default behavior is arbitrary.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/