Re: Suspend 2 merge: 9/51: init/* changes.

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Fri Nov 26 2004 - 18:07:40 EST


Hi!

> > > > And if you really want to make it changeable, pass major:minor from userland; once
> > > > userland is running getting them is easy.
> > >
> > > Yes, but that's also far uglier, and who thinks in terms of major and
> > > minor numbers anyway? I think of my harddrive as /dev/sda, not 08:xx.
> > > The parsing accepts majors and minors, of course, but shouldn't we make
> > > these things easier to do, not harder? (Would we insist on using majors
> > > and minors for root=?).
> >
> > Kernel interface is not supposed to be "easy". root= has exception,
> > that's init code, and you can't easily ls -al /dev at that point. If
> > you want easy interface, create userland program that looks up
> > minor/major in /dev/ and uses them.
>
> That's a fair possibility, but is it really worth it when all we need to
> do is make two routines not be init? We would still have to duplicate
> some of this code elsewhere anyway, because we need to parse the major
> and minor numbers.

Parsing major/minor should be as simple as sscanf("%d %d"). And you'll
have one less modification to generic code. Yes I think it is worth
it.

Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/