Re: [RFC] Splitting kernel headers and deprecating __KERNEL__

[Tomas Carnecky]

Grzegorz Kulewski wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, David Howells wrote:
>
> >     (b) Make kernel file #include the user file.
>
>
> Does kernel really need to include user headers? When it is definition
> of some const then it should be defined in one file (to be sure it has
> only one definition).

You have do define a interface between the kernel and the userspace..
you either include kernel headers from userspace (with a lot of 
__KERNEL__ in them) or you make separate headers with the definitions 
and include them in both kernel and userspace (better).
BTW, these are not userspace headers like the ones in /usr/include, 
those are just special headers preparated so that they can be included 
both from the kernel and userspace.

> But user headers may have some compatibility hacks
> that kernel do not need (and even maybe does not want) to have.

About the compatibility hacks.. now it's time to remove them, together 
with this change. I don't think this will happen before 2.7/2.8 and 
until then all should have changed their code.
If you announce these changes soon enough and the developers have enough 
time to change their code, I don't see any problems.
Maybe you also could wrap these definitions in some #ifdef's and mark 
them as deprecated and write somewhere that they'll be removed in the 
next stable tree (2.8). So you could check if a library compiles with 
the new headers or if it still uses some old definitions.

tom
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/