On Monday 29 November 2004 20:50, K.R. Foley wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
make that -31-13 (or later). Earlier kernels had a bug in where
[...]
Is this all that is in the log? For some reason there are 820
samples not represented in the output above. The ms+ hits would
have been represented by something like:
Nov 29 18:05:45 coyote kernel: 9999 4
Ok, I finally got -13 to run (typo in grub), and you are now correct in that the final entry in the log after I shut tvtime down is like this:
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: rtc latency histogram of {tvtime/3911, 10430 samples}:
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 4 51
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 5 2058
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 6 3594
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 7 1270
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 8 473
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 9 299
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 10 252
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 11 209
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 12 215
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 13 345
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 14 391
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 15 248
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 16 113
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 17 55
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 18 17
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 19 11
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 20 4
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 21 1
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 23 2
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 28 1
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 4612 1
Nov 29 23:43:40 coyote kernel: 9999 820
What does this tell you now? The last 2 lines look a bit strange to
me. Particularly since the runtime was random enough that your previous comment about the number 820 was a mssing count, and what came out of a seperate run IS an 820.
I find that a bit hard to believe that I timed those two runs identically.