Re: [RFC] Splitting kernel headers and deprecating __KERNEL__

[Chris Friesen]

Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:44:21PM +0100, Mariusz Mazur wrote:

> > Wrong. These dirs must be linked to /usr/include so they must have more 
> > meaningfull names.
>
>
> WTF?  I've got a dozen kernel trees hanging around, which one (and WTF any,
> while we are at it) should be "linked to"?

Just my point of view, but I'd love to have /usr/include/linux and 
/usr/include/asm linked to the headers for the currently running kernel.

For a while I was playing with adding a bunch of new syscalls, and it sure would 
have been nice to be able to just include <asm/unistd.h> and get the up-to-date 
syscalls for whatever kernel I happened to be running.

I've since switched to using a device node and doing ioctl() calls to get around 
this, but the issue still stands as I need to either import the ioctl() command 
numbers and data types, or else I have to duplicate the header in userspace and 
keep the two versions up to date.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/