Re: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2

From: P
Date: Mon Dec 06 2004 - 12:49:03 EST


Robert Love wrote:
The reason I proposed my ideas for tying the two values together is that I am
concerned about breaking existing code.


Nothing should break.

If apps don't explicitly set their i/o priority, then they get the
default. Not a big deal.

This allows the default case to be the same as today.

Robert Love

For reference, this was discussed last year:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106847268508985&w=2

--
PÃdraig Brady - http://www.pixelbeat.org
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/