Re: [discuss] Re: unregister_ioctl32_conversion and modules. ioctl32 revisited.
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Thu Dec 16 2004 - 03:34:49 EST
Quoting r. Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxx) "Re: [discuss] Re: unregister_ioctl32_conversion and modules. ioctl32 revisited.":
> Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think Michael's patch is best (but I'm probably biased) because it addresses
> > the independent problem of a race in unregister_ioctl32_conversion() too
> > (and some other smaller issues in ioctl 32bit emulation)
> They should be separate patches.
> > Andrew, could we replace unlocked_ioctl.patch with Michael's patch?
> Where would one locate Michael's patch?
Here it is for review (against 2.6.10-rc3) http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/15/62
I plan to incorporate Arnd Bergmann's comments and repost later today.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/