Re: [discuss] Re: unregister_ioctl32_conversion and modules. ioctl32 revisited.
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thu Dec 16 2004 - 03:43:17 EST
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:25:39AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think Michael's patch is best (but I'm probably biased) because it addresses
> > the independent problem of a race in unregister_ioctl32_conversion() too
> > (and some other smaller issues in ioctl 32bit emulation)
> They should be separate patches.
The two new methods (ioctl_native and ioctl_compat) are in the same patch
because they basically touch the same piece of code and would be hard
to separate. The other stuff (actually replacing register_ioctl32_conversion and
converting a few obvious users to use the BKL less fast path) will be addon patches.
> > Andrew, could we replace unlocked_ioctl.patch with Michael's patch?
> Where would one locate Michael's patch?
See his mail.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/