Re: arch/xen is a bad idea

[Rik van Riel]

On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I'm not convinced that maintaining xen/i386 in its current form
> > >  is going to be as hard as Andi thinks. We already share many
> > >  files unmodified from i386.
> >
> > How are they shared?  Inclusion, symlinks, makefile references or
>
> The makefile creates symlinks.

Which is really very nice.  If you update arch/i386/ then
arch/xen/ automatically gets the update too.

--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/