Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend on EMBEDDED
From: Pete Zaitcev
Date: Sun Dec 19 2004 - 19:32:14 EST
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 01:16:44 +0100, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there except for kernel size any good reason for using BLK_DEV_UB
> instead of USB_STORAGE?
It depends. I like it.
> config BLK_DEV_UB
> tristate "Low Performance USB Block driver"
> - depends on USB
> + depends on USB && EMBEDDED
The ub has nothing to do with embedded systems, most of which do not run
with CONFIG_EMBEDDED, BTW.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/