Re: [PATCH] back out CPU clock additions to posix-timers
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Mon Dec 20 2004 - 15:16:41 EST
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > The conservative line is to keep a consistent definition of the interface
> > following posix as closely as possible.
> The conservative line for Linux is to not change the interface from 2.6.9,
> period. If Andrew prefers the partial changes, I don't have a strong
> objection. But it is by no means the conservative thing to do.
Conservative means minimal changes to the existing tested code of
2.6.10-rcX and reduction of a potential future flux in the kernel API.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/