Re: [PATCH] USB: fix Scheduling while atomic warning when resuming.

[Jeff Garzik]

David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 December 2004 7:48 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > If we are going for a minimalist -rc patch, why not drop the lock, 
> > sleep, then reacquire the lock?
>
>
> If that lock were dropped, what would prevent other tasks from
> touching the hardware while it's sending RESUME signaling down
> the bus, and thereby mucking up the resume sequence?

Precisely what other tasks are active for this hardware, during resume?

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/