Re: swsusp bigdiff [was Re: [PATCH] Software Suspend split to two stage V2.]
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Wed Dec 22 2004 - 16:33:37 EST
> > Well, we are starting with small steps... And since nobody knows how
> > to do one-device-suspend properly, we started with fixing system
> > suspend first.
> > Passing structure instead of u32 should make one-device-suspend easier
> > in future... Hopefully.
> I could spend some time working on a proposal for this, if you like. It
> would probably do me good in preparation for my presentation on 2.6 PM
> (in general) at the CELF Linux Form next month.
You mean proposal for one-device-suspend? Well, I'd really like to
have whole machine case working, first... Then, yes, that would be
nice. It needs to be discussed at linux-pm list.
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/