Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine

[Jesse Allen]

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:35:44 +0100, Thomas Sailer <sailer@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Mike,
> 
> thanks a lot for your mail. I've just tried Jesse Allen's Patch with
> 2.6.10-ac1, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to be enough to get xst
> working again. Let me know if (and how :)) I can help gather evidence.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 


If the single-stepping changes truly broke your program, and you know
< 2.6.9-rc1 works, try this attached diff against 2.6.10 in addition
to the other one I made.  This should effectively reverse change #2,
but like I said, the current code for change #2 actually works for me
now.  But maybe this is not enough.  You can also look here at my
original report:

http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2004/11/0310.html

and reverse the original patches against 2.6.9, and see if that kernel
works then. Patch links:

http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@xxxxxx

Jesse
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c	2004-12-29 12:54:59.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-mod/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c	2004-12-29 12:53:23.000000000 -0700
@@ -426,8 +426,8 @@
 	 */
 	if (regs->eflags & TF_MASK) {
 		regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
-		if (current->ptrace & PT_DTRACE)
-			ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
+//		if (current->ptrace & PT_DTRACE)
+//			ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
 	}
 
 #if DEBUG_SIG