Re: [PATCH] swsusp: properly suspend and resume *all* devices

[Barry K. Nathan]

On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:15:30PM -0800, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> Hmmm... I'm not sure how necessary it is, and I think it slows down
> resume a tiny bit. However, the more I think about it the more correct it
> seems, so here's the follow-up patch. (Andrew, even if this patch is
> rejected, please commit my first one to the next -mm release. That patch
> alone is still an improvement over the current code.)

Ugh. I forgot to mention in my previous mail that the patch is against
2.6.10-mm1 + my previous patch (perhaps that was obvious), and that I've
lightly tested the patch (that probably wasn't obvious, to say the
least).

-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@xxxxxxxxx>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/