Re: [PATCH] add feature-removal-schedule.txt documentation

[Randy.Dunlap]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 03:26:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Which begs the question "how do we ever get rid of these things when we
> > have no projected date for Linux-2.8"?
> >
> > I'd propose:
> >
> > a) Create Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt which describes
> >   things which are going away, when, why, who is involved, etc.
>
> Ok, I'll bite, here's a patch that does just that.  Look good?

Brodo, can you add a little more info to this, please?

---
Add 2.4.x cpufreq /proc and sysctl interface removal
to the feature-removal-schedule.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>

diffstat:=
 Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |    9 +++++++++
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

---
diff -Naurp ./Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt~cpufreq ./Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
--- ./Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt~cpufreq	2005-01-07 08:48:26.568969672 -0800
+++ ./Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt	2005-01-07 08:55:50.658457808 -0800
@@ -15,3 +15,12 @@ Why:	It has been unmaintained for a numb
 	against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev.
 Who:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
 
+---------------------------
+
+What:	/proc/sys/cpu and the sysctl interface to cpufreq (2.4.x interfaces)
+When:	January 2005
+Files:	drivers/cpufreq/: cpufreq_userspace.c, proc_intf.c
+	function calls throughout the kernel tree
+Why:	Deprecated, has been replaced/superseded by (what?)....
+Who:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxx>
+