Re: Make pipe data structure be a circular list of pages, rather

[Alan Cox]

On Sad, 2005-01-08 at 18:41, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> For all of those that are valid (certainly the signal case), you need to
> put the pipe into nonblocking mode anyway, so I don't think coalescing is
> really needed. SuS certainly does _not_ seem guarantee that you can do
> many nonblocking writes (small _or_ big). Let's see if somebody reports 
> any trouble with the new world order.

It breaks netscape 3 if I simulate it (but thats picking an app I know
makes silly assumptions).

>From the rules pasted below I think the 1 byte at a time 4K write is
guaranteed or at least strongly implied. The single write atomicity is
guaranteed but that is if anything made easier by the changes.

(From pathconf)

	fpathconf(_PC_PATH_BUF)

             returns  the  size of the pipe buffer, where filedes must
refer
              to a pipe or FIFO and path must refer to  a  FIFO.  The 
corre-
              sponding macro is _POSIX_PIPE_BUF.

(From pwrite)

Write requests of {PIPE_BUF} bytes or less shall not be interleaved with
data from other processes doing writes on the same pipe. Writes of
greater than {PIPE_BUF} bytes may have data interleaved, on arbitrary
boundaries, with writes by other processes, whether or not the
O_NONBLOCK flag of the file status flags is set.

[of O_NDELAY for pipe]
A write request for {PIPE_BUF} or fewer bytes shall have the following
effect: if there is sufficient space available in the pipe, write()
shall transfer all the data and return the number of bytes requested.
Otherwise, write() shall transfer no data and return -1 with errno set
to [EAGAIN].


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/