Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c lockless access

From: David Wagner
Date: Sun Jan 09 2005 - 17:34:12 EST


Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
>What about UDP (or just eth) broadcasting the oops and catching it
>on another system?

For security reasons, it better be optional and disabled by default.
(That should be easy enough to ensure, so this is obviously not something
to stand in the way of doing something like this.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/