Re: Linux NFS vs NetApp

[Lincoln Dale]

At 08:54 PM 11/01/2005, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday January 10, phyprabab@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am trying to understand how NetApp can be so much
> > better at NFS servicing than my quad Opteron 250 SAN
> > attached machine.  So I need some help and some
> > pointers to understand how I can make my opteron
> > machine come on par (or within 70% NFS performance
> > range) as that of my NetApp R200.  I have run through
> > the NFS-how-to's and have heard "that is why they cost
> > so much more", but I really have to consider that
> > probably most of the ideas that are in the NetApp are
> > common knowldge (just not in my head).
> >
> > Can anyone shed some light on this?
>
> If you want to come anything close to comparable with a Netapp, get a
> few hundred Megabytes of NVRAM (e.g. www.umem.com), and configure it
> as an external journal for your filesystem (I know this can be done
> for ext3, I don't know about other filesystems).  Then make sure your
> filesystem journals all data, not just metadata (data=journal option
> to ext3).

NetApp's WAFL only journals metadata in NVRAM ...
(one of the primary reasons its called WAFL is that the data-write only 
happens once..).


cheers,

lincoln.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/