Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

[Sytse Wielinga]

On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:57:23PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > * Jack O'Quin <joq@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> According to the manpage, nice(2) is per-process not per-thread.  That
> >> does not give the granularity we need. 
> 
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > the manpage is incorrect - sys_nice() is per-thread. (Btw., you could
> > use setpriority() too.)
> 
> OK.  Where is this stuff documented?
> 
> BTW, I think this violates POSIX, which states...
> 
>   The nice value set with nice() shall be applied to the process. If
>   the process is multi-threaded, the nice value shall affect all
>   system scope threads in the process.

We are talking about two different things here. POSIX is just about API and
has, correct me if I'm wrong, nothing to do with system calls whatsoever. The
manpage nice(2) is about the libc library call nice(), which is per-process,
which it should be according to POSIX. The system call, called sys_nice() in C,
is per-thread. Apparently glibc or some thread library contains some magic to
make the translation.

Sytse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/