Re: [PATCH]sched: Isochronous class v2 for unprivileged soft rtscheduling

From: Jack O'Quin
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 19:33:05 EST


Peter Chubb <peterc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>>>>> "Jack" == Jack O'Quin <joq@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> Jack> Looks like we need to do another study to determine which
> Jack> filesystem works best for multi-track audio recording and
> Jack> playback. XFS looks promising, but only if they get the latency
> Jack> right. Any experience with that?
>
> The nice thing about audio/video and XFS is that if you know ahead of
> time the max size of a file (and you usually do -- because you know
> ahead of time how long a take is going to be) you can precreadte the
> file as a contiguous chunk, then just fill it in, for minimum disc
> latency.

I am not talking about disk latency. The problem Con uncovered in
ReiserFS was CPU hogging. Every 20 seconds there was a 6msec latency
glitch in system response.
--
joq
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/