Re: [patch 1/13] Qsort

[Andreas Gruenbacher]

On Sunday 23 January 2005 06:32, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Yes, indeed. Though I think even here, we'd prefer to use kmalloc
> because gcc generates suboptimal code for variable-sized stack vars.

That's ridiculous. kmalloc isn't even close to whatever suboptimal code gcc 
might produce here. Also I'm not convinced that gcc generates bad code in the 
first place. The code I get makes perfect sense.

-- Andreas.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/