Re: negative diskspace usage

[Wichert Akkerman]

Previously Andries Brouwer wrote:
> I assume this was produced by statfs or statfs64 or so.

statfs64 indeed.

> Are you still able to examine the situation?

No, but I do have some more information. A e2fsck run on that filesystem
was just as interesting:

/dev/md4: clean, 16/132480 files, -15514/264960 blocks

Forcing an e2fsck revelated a few groups with incorrect block counts:

Free blocks count wrong for group #2 (34308, counted=32306).
Free blocks count wrong for group #6 (45805, counted=32306).
Free blocks count wrong for group #8 (14741, counted=2354).
Free blocks count wrong (280474, counted=252586).

After fixing those everything returned to normal. I did run dumpe2fs
on the filesystem, if that is interesting I can retrieve and post that.

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx>    It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/