Re: [ea-in-inode 0/5] Further fixes

[Andreas Gruenbacher]

On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 12:24, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
> Andreas,
> 
> I'm starting to think the bug I saw is hardware error. [...]

The patch in my prevous message (Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:32:16 +0100) still
makes sense, if only for cleanliness: Without it, the i_extra_isize
field of reserved inodes is zeroed even though we're not allowing
in-inode attributes there. It's probably better to leave the garbage in
these inodes untouched; we could in theory disable in-inode attributes
for arbitrary inodes with this change.

Cheers,
-- 
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, SUSE LINUX GMBH

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/