Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:41:11 +0100
Jurriaan <thunder7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:43:36PM +0300
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:54:49 +0100
> > Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > It seems noone who reviewed the SuperIO patches noticed that there are 
> > > now two modules "scx200" in the kernel...
> > 
> > They are almost mutually exlusive(SuperIO contains more advanced), 
> > so I do not see any problem here.
> > Only one of them can be loaded in a time.
> > 
> > So what does exactly bother you?
> > 
> lsmod in bugreports giving unspecific results, for example.

If you load scx200 from superio subsystem, then obviously you can not
use old i2c/acb modules which require old scx200.
And vice versa.

One needs to load exactly what he wants.

> Kind regards,
> Jurriaan
> -- 
> "So you believe."
> Jewel ATerafin shrugged. "I have more than belief, but I don't have a
> pressing need to convince you of anything."
> 	Michelle West - Sea of Sorrows.
> Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.10-mm1 2x6078 bogomips load 0.52


	Evgeniy Polyakov

Only failure makes us experts. -- Theo de Raadt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/