Re: 2.6.11-rc2: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140

From: Chris Wedgwood
Date: Mon Jan 24 2005 - 17:45:54 EST

Next message: chas williams - CONTRACTOR: "Re: [Linux-ATM-General] Kernel 2.6.10 and 2.4.29 Oops fore200e (fwd)"
Previous message: David Mosberger: "Re: inter_module_get and __symbol_get"
In reply to: Ernst Herzberg: "2.6.11-rc2: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140"
Next in thread: Ernst Herzberg: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Fixed in -bk on Sunday.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: chas williams - CONTRACTOR: "Re: [Linux-ATM-General] Kernel 2.6.10 and 2.4.29 Oops fore200e (fwd)"
Previous message: David Mosberger: "Re: inter_module_get and __symbol_get"
In reply to: Ernst Herzberg: "2.6.11-rc2: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140"
Next in thread: Ernst Herzberg: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]