Re: [PATCH]sched: Isochronous class v2 for unprivileged soft rt scheduling

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jack O'Quin <joq@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I was just pointing out that saying nice(-20) works as well as
> SCHED_ISO, though true, doesn't mean much since neither of them
> (currently) work well enough to be useful.

ok. While i still think nice--20 can be quite good for some purposes, it
will probably not solve all problems that the audio applications need
solved.

> For good reasons, most audio developers prefer the POSIX realtime
> interfaces.  They are far from perfect, but remain the only workable,
> portable solution available.  That is why I like your rt_cpu_limit
> proposal so much better that this one.

ok - lets forget about nice--20 for now.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/