Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

[Yasuyuki KOZAKAI]

Hi,

From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:16:36 +0900 (JST)

> In article <41FDBB78.2050403@xxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 06:00:40 +0100), Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
> |We don't need this for IPv6 yet. Once we get nf_conntrack in we
> |might need this, but its IPv6 fragment handling is different from
> |ip_conntrack, I need to check first.
> 
> Ok. It would be better to have some comment but anyway...
> kozakai-san?

IMO, fix for nf_conntrack isn't needed yet. Because someone may change
IPv6 fragment handling in nf_conntrack.

Anyway, current nf_conntrack passes the original (not de-fragmented) skb to
IPv6 stack. nf_conntrack doesn't touch its dst.

Regards,
----------------------------------------
Yasuyuki KOZAKAI

Communication Platform Laboratory,
Corporate Research & Development Center,
Toshiba Corporation

yasuyuki.kozakai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/