Re: Disabling IRQ #xx, because nobody cared!

From: William Park
Date: Mon Jan 31 2005 - 02:56:46 EST


On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:32:12AM +0000, William Park wrote:
> I'm runing 2.6.10 SMP. I usually use APM, but I decided to try ACPI.
> On my machine, USB (integrated) and Audio (PCI card) shares IRQ:
...
> After a while, I get
>
> irq 185: nobody cared!
> [<c01339e2>] __report_bad_irq+0x22/0x90
> [<c0133ad8>] note_interrupt+0x58/0x90
> [<c0133578>] __do_IRQ+0x128/0x130
> [<c0104eba>] do_IRQ+0x1a/0x30
> [<c010370a>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
> [<c0100690>] default_idle+0x0/0x40
> [<c01006ba>] default_idle+0x2a/0x40
> [<c0100760>] cpu_idle+0x40/0x70
> handlers:
> [<e086e000>] (snd_audiopci_interrupt+0x0/0xc0 [snd_ens1371])
> Disabling IRQ #185
>
> Then, after some more time, I get
>
> irq 11: nobody cared!
> [<c01339e2>] __report_bad_irq+0x22/0x90
> [<c0133ad8>] note_interrupt+0x58/0x90
> [<c0133578>] __do_IRQ+0x128/0x130
> [<c0104eba>] do_IRQ+0x1a/0x30
> [<c010370a>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
> [<c0100690>] default_idle+0x0/0x40
> [<c01006ba>] default_idle+0x2a/0x40
> [<c0100760>] cpu_idle+0x40/0x70
> [<c03728c7>] start_kernel+0x147/0x170
> handlers:
> [<c0227ef0>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60)
> [<c0227ef0>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60)
>
> At which point, USB is dead.
>
> Do you know if 'acpi' is responsible for this?

Solved! After many kernel compile and many kernel paramters,
'acpi=noirq' or 'pci=noacpi' solved the IRQ being disabled.

I'm running Abit VP6 dual-P3 (Via Apollo 133A, VT82C694X, VT82C686B).

--
William Park <opengeometry@xxxxxxxx>, Toronto, Canada
Slackware Linux -- because I can type.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/