Re: [PATCH 0/8] base-small: CONFIG_BASE_SMALL for small systems

[Matt Mackall]

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:55:32PM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > This patch series introduced a new pair of CONFIG_EMBEDDED options call
> > CONFIG_BASE_FULL/CONFIG_BASE_SMALL. Disabling CONFIG_BASE_FULL sets
> > the boolean CONFIG_BASE_SMALL to 1 and it is used to shrink a number
> > of core data structures. The space savings for the current batch is
> > around 14k.
> 
> Why _two_ config options?

Um, Andrew made me do it?

One option is an int and is used thusly:

#define FOO (CONFIG_BASE_SMALL ? 1 : 1000)

But it's also sometimes useful to have two opposing options so that
you can use:

obj-(CONFIG_OBJ_A) += a.obj obj-(CONFIG_OBJ_B) += b.obj

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/