Re: Please open sysfs symbols to proprietary modules

[Pavel Roskin]

Hi, Joseph!

On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Joseph Pingenot wrote:

> > From Pavel Roskin on Wednesday, 02 February, 2005:
> > All I want to do is to have a module that would create subdirectories for
> > some network interfaces under /sys/class/net/*/, which would contain
> > additional parameters for those interfaces.  I'm not creating a new
> > subsystem or anything like that.  sysctl is not good because the data is
> > interface specific.  ioctl on a socket would be OK, although it wouldn't
> > be easily scriptable.  The restriction on sysfs symbols would just force
> > me to write a proprietary userspace utility to set those parameters
> > instead of using a shell script.
>
> Please pardon my ignorance, but if the existing network device management
>  framework is insufficient, it seems that the optimal way to deal with
>  this is to work with the community to address the insufficiencies, not
>  hacking in a new interface to the device.

OK, then the "insufficiency" is inability to set and get additional named 
variables for network interfaces.

I won't open all details, but suppose I want the bridge to handle certain 
frames in a special way, just like BPDU frames are handled if STP is 
enabled.  There is a hook for that already - see br_handle_frame_hook. 
The proprietary module would just have to change it.

What I want it to tell that module what to do with those special frames. 
I also want to get information like what was in the last special frame and 
how many of them have been received.  In other words, I want the 
proprietary module to communicate with userspace.  Ideally, the userspace 
application should be a simple shell script, so I'm reluctant to use 
ioctl.

--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/