Re: Race condition in ptrace

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Feb 04 2005 - 18:05:23 EST


Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> > Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> >> Bodo Stroesser wrote:
>
> >> I don't see how this could help because AFAIKS, child->saving is only
> >> set and cleared while the runqueue is locked. And the same runqueue lock
> >> is taken by wait_task_inactive.
> >>
> >
> > Sorry, that not right. There are some routines called by sched(), that
> > release
> > and reacquire the runqueue lock.
> >
>
> Oh yeah, it is the wake_sleeping_dependent / dependent_sleeper crap.
> Sorry, you are right. And that's definitely a bug in sched.c, because
> it breaks wait_task_inactive, as you've rightly observed.
>
> Andrew, IMO this is another bug to hold 2.6.11 for.

Sure. I wouldn't consider Bodo's patch to be the one to use though..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/