Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0)

From: David S. Miller
Date: Sat Feb 05 2005 - 23:21:24 EST


On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:46:43 +1100
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This doesn't work because net/core/dst.c can only search based
> on dst->dev. For the split device case, dst->dev is set to
> loopback_dev while rt6i_idev is set to the real device.

Indeed. I didn't catch that.

> If we wanted to preserve the split device semantics, then we
> can create a local GC list in IPv6 so that it can search based
> on rt6i_idev as well as the other keys.

Ok, so this would entail changing each ipv6 dst_free() call
into one to ip6_dst_free(), which would:

ip6_garbage_add(dst);
dst_free(dst);

It would mean that dst_run_gc() would need to have some callback
like dst->ops->gc_destroy() or similar, which would allow ipv6
to delete the dst from it's local garbage list.

> Alternatively we can
> remove the dst->dev == dev check in dst_dev_event and dst_ifdown
> and move that test down to the individual ifdown functions.

I think there is a hole in this idea.... maybe.

If the idea is to scan dst_garbage_list down in ipv6 specific code,
you can't do that since 'dst' objects from every pool in the kernel
get put onto the dst_garbage_list. It is generic.

They have no identity, so it's illegal to treat any member of that
list as an rt_entry, rt6_entry or any specific higher level dst
type.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/