Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

[Ingo Molnar]

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to
> > the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)?
> 
> I did:
> 
> --- /home/rafael/tmp/kernel/testing/linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c	2005-02-05 20:57:03.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c	2005-02-06 19:07:39.000000000 +0100
> @@ -871,6 +869,7 @@
>  	restore_processor_state();
>  	restore_highmem();
>  	device_power_up();
> +	touch_softlockup_watchdog();
>  	local_irq_enable();
>  	return error;
>  }
> 
> and it still complains, but the call trace is now different:

could you describe the timings a bit more - how long it takes to do the
resume, and when does the watchdog print out its warning. Is it a single
warning only, and once the resume succeeds, the watchdog doesnt complain
anymore, correct?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/