Re: [PATCH] Altix : ioc4 serial driver support

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon Feb 07 2005 - 11:28:03 EST


On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Patrick Gefre wrote:
> Latest version with review mods:
> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/033-ioc4-support


- still not __iomem annotations.
- still a ->remove method

more comments (mostly nipicks I missed last time, nothing too exciting):


+#define DEVICE_NAME_DYNAMIC "ttyIOC0" /* need full name for misc_register */

this one is completely unused.

+#define PENDING(_p) readl(&(_p)->ip_mem->sio_ir) & _p->ip_ienb

probably wants some braces around the macro body

+static struct ioc4_port *get_ioc4_port(struct uart_port *the_port)
+{
+ struct ioc4_control *control = dev_get_drvdata(the_port->dev);
+ int ii;
+
+ if (control) {
+ for ( ii = 0; ii < IOC4_NUM_SERIAL_PORTS; ii++ ) {
+ if (!control->ic_port[ii].icp_port)
+ continue;
+ if (the_port == control->ic_port[ii].icp_port->ip_port)
+ return control->ic_port[ii].icp_port;
+ }
+ }
+ return (struct ioc4_port *)0;

just return NULL here.

+static irqreturn_t ioc4_intr(int irq, void *arg, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ struct ioc4_soft *soft;
+ uint32_t this_ir, this_mir;
+ int xx, num_intrs = 0;
+ int intr_type;
+ int handled = 0;
+ struct ioc4_intr_info *ii;
+
+ soft = (struct ioc4_soft *)arg;
+ if (!soft)
+ return IRQ_NONE; /* Polled but no ioc4 registered */

no need to cast. and it can't be NULL either.

+ spin_lock_irqsave(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
+ wake_up_interruptible(&info->delta_msr_wait);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);

no need to lock around a wake_up()

+ /* Start up the serial port */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
+ retval = ic4_startup_local(the_port);
+ if (retval) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
+ return retval;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
+ return 0;

what about just

spin_lock_irqsave(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
retval = ic4_startup_local(the_port);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
return reval;

?

+ struct ioc4_port *port = get_ioc4_port(the_port);
+ unsigned long port_flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
+ ioc4_change_speed(the_port, termios, old_termios);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
+ return;

no need for empty returns at the end of void functions

+static struct uart_driver ioc4_uart = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .driver_name = "ioc4_serial",
+ .dev_name = DEVICE_NAME,
+ .major = DEVICE_MAJOR,
+ .minor = DEVICE_MINOR,
+ .nr = IOC4_NUM_CARDS * IOC4_NUM_SERIAL_PORTS,
+ .cons = NULL,
+};

no need to initialize .cons to zero, the compiler does that for you.

+ if ( !request_region(tmp_addr, sizeof(struct ioc4_mem), "sioc4_mem")) {

superflous space before the !

+ if (!request_irq(pdev->irq, ioc4_intr, SA_SHIRQ,
+ "sgi-ioc4serial", (void *)soft)) {
+ control->ic_irq = pdev->irq;
+ } else {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ "%s : request_irq fails for IRQ 0x%x\n ",
+ __FUNCTION__, pdev->irq);
+ }

Can the driver work without an irq?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/