Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Feb 07 2005 - 19:17:26 EST


Matthew Dobson <colpatch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sorry to reply a long quiet thread,

Is appreciated, thanks.

> but I've been trading emails with Paul
> Jackson on this subject recently, and I've been unable to convince either him
> or myself that merging CPUSETs and CKRM is as easy as I once believed. I'm
> still convinced the CPU side is doable, but I haven't managed as much success
> with the memory binding side of CPUSETs. In light of this, I'd like to remove
> my previous objections to CPUSETs moving forward. If others still have things
> they want discussed before CPUSETs moves into mainline, that's fine, but it
> seems to me that CPUSETs offer legitimate functionality and that the code has
> certainly "done its time" in -mm to convince me it's stable and usable.

OK, I'll add cpusets to the 2.6.12 queue.

going once, going twice...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/