Re: [PATCH] Filesystem linking protections

From: John Richard Moser
Date: Mon Feb 07 2005 - 21:12:12 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Chris Wright wrote:
> * John Richard Moser (nigelenki@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
>>Yes, mkdtemp() and mkstemp().
>>
>>Of course we can't always rely on programmers to get it right, so the
>>idea here is to make sure we ask broken code to behave nicely, and stab
>>it in the face if it doesn't. Please try to examine this in that scope.
>
>
> It's fine for hardened distro. But still inappropriate for mainline.
>

Perhaps in mainline as an option? The [*] notations next to things are
really nice, they let you turn kernel stuff on and off :) It's
appropriate for mainline to support added security isn't it? I think
following the path of supporting-but-not-forcing is the best route,
because it encourages people to account for systems which may take
advantage of such options, and thus leads to a software base in which
it's quite sane to actually enable those options globally.

That's just how I think though.

> thanks,
> -chris

- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCCB+GhDd4aOud5P8RAlD9AJ45JTY20WY6qHe0h0ZIcFasgxJDtACbB1aB
i4hytMAy6Cs1AUNXC296JOk=
=oLVs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/