Re: Real-Time Preemption and UML?

[Jeff Dike]

mingo@xxxxxxx said:
> Jeff, any objections against adding this change to UML at some point?

No, not at all.  I just need to understand what CONFIG_PREEMPT requires of
UML.

>From a quick read of Documentation/preempt-locking.txt, this looks like it's
implementing Rule #3 (unlock by the same task that locked), which looks fine.

				Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/