Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:31:20 -0500 (EST), Sean <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, February 18, 2005 2:26 pm, Dmitry Torokhov said:
> 
> > What is bk2cvs gateway that is maintained by Larry then? Just call it
> > your "head" that Linus feeds from his BK repository and you are all
> > set.
> >
> > I can see  that Roman and Stellian want something different, but we
> > alerady have what you have just described.
> >
> 
> Bitkeeper isn't motivated to raise the bar in terms of implementation, nor
> is cvs the best choice in terms of which free tool to use.

You from cvs you can import into other SCM of your choise.

>  Once a free
> SCM is actually used at the head, there are opportunities to implement
> updating too, not just pulling.

Heh, you don't get to update the master repository even if you are
using BK.  And you are free to update your local tree with
CVS/SVN/whatever. So I am not sure why you trying this argument.

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/