Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Monday 21 February 2005 00:43, Miles Bader wrote:
> "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > The "cost" of using BK seems to be primarily more theoretical, and
> > ideological, than real.
> 
> I've never used BK (not allowed to), but some things I've read about it
> sound quite annoying.  For instance:
> 
>  * Every source tree contains your entire repository => massive disk usage

It's not too bad as you just hardlink most of the trees to their parent.
 
>  * Must "unlock" files before working on them ("bk edit"); I recall
>    doing this with RCS, and it was, well, a real pain.

I think there is a setting to have them checked out for editing automatically.

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/