Re: [PATCH] A new entry for /proc

[Mauricio Lin]

Hi all,

I tested the two smaps entry using time command.

I tested 100.000 cat commands with smaps for each version.

I checked the difference between the two versions and the new one is
faster than old one. So Hugh is correct about the loop performance.

Thanks!!!

Mauricio Lin.

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:52:55 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mauricio Lin <mauriciolin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > But can i use jiffies to measure this kind of performance??? AFAIK, if
> >  it is more efficient, then it is faster, right? How can I know how
> >  fast it is? Any idea?
> 
> umm,
> 
> time ( for i in $(seq 100); do; cat /proc/nnn/smaps; done > /dev/null )
> 
> ?
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/