Re: [PATCH] vm: mlock superfluous variable

[Darren Hart]

Chris Wright wrote:
> * Darren Hart (dvhltc@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
> > The were a couple long standing (since at least 2.4.21) superfluous 
> > variables and two unnecessary assignments in do_mlock().  The intent of 
> > the resulting code is also more obvious.
> >
> > Tested on a 4 way x86 box running a simple mlock test program.  No 
> > problems detected.
>
>
> Did you test with multiple page ranges, and locking subsets of vmas?
> Seems that splitting could cause a problem since you now sample vm_end
> before and after fixup, where the vma could be changed in the middle.

Thanks for catching that Chris.  Both the tmp variable and the next 
variable are indeed needed since mlock_fixup could modify both.  Please 
disregard this patch.

--Darren
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/