Re: sched_yield behavior

[Lee Revell]

On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 11:58 +0100, Giovanni Tusa wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a question about the sched_yield behavior of Linux O(1) scheduler,
> for RT tasks.
> By reading some documentation, I found that " ....real-time tasks are a
> special case, because
> when they want to explicitly yield the processor to other waiting processes,
> they are merely
> moved to the end of their priority list (and not inserted into the expired
> array, like conventional
> processes)."
> I have to implement an RT task with the highest priority in the system (it
> is also the only task within the
> priority list for such priority level). Moreover, it has to be a SCHED_FIFO
> task,  so that it can preempt
> SCHED_RR ones, because of its strong real-time requirements. However,
> sometimes it should relinquish the
> CPU, to give to other tasks a chance to run.
> Now, what happen if it gives up the CPU by means of the sched_yield() system
> call?
> If  I am not wrong, the scheduler will choose it again (it will be still the
> higher priority task, and the only of its priority list).
> I have to add an explicit sleep to effectively relinquish the CPU for some
> time, or the scheduler can deal with such a
> situation in another way?

What exactly are you trying to do?  I don't understand how the task
could have "strong real-time requirements" if it's CPU bound.  What is
the exact nature of the real time constraint?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/