Re: [patch 3/2] drivers/char/vt.c: remove unnecessary code

[linux-os]

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 colbuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> We could change an affectation into an incrementation by this patch, and,
> so far I know, incrementing is quicker than or as quick as setting
> a variable (depends on the architecture).
>
> Please _don't_ apply this, but tell me what you think about it.
> Note that npar is unsigned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Colbus <emmanuel.colbus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Since it is common practice to write code as:
               for(npar = 0 ; npar < NPAR ; npar++)
... it is quite likely that the compiler does a better job with
that code than what you substitute. And, if you did a check
of the code generation, it might be different between different
compiler versions.


This kind of "code optimization" won't optimize anything in
the long-run.


> --- old/drivers/char/vt.c       2004-12-24 22:35:25.000000000 +0100
> +++ new/drivers/char/vt.c       2005-02-28 12:53:57.933256631 +0100
> @@ -1655,9 +1655,9 @@
>                        vc_state = ESnormal;
>                return;
>        case ESsquare:
> -               for(npar = 0 ; npar < NPAR ; npar++)
> +               for(npar = NPAR-1; npar < NPAR; npar--)
>                        par[npar] = 0;
> +               npar++;
> -               npar = 0;
>                vc_state = ESgetpars;
>                if (c == '[') { /* Function key */
>                        vc_state=ESfunckey;
>
>
> --
> Emmanuel Colbus
> Club GNU/Linux
> ENSIMAG - departement telecoms

Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.10 on an i686 machine (5537.79 BogoMips).
 Notice : All mail here is now cached for review by Dictator Bush.
                 98.36% of all statistics are fiction.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/